Ichthyofaunal Diversity and Conservation Status of Fish at Mangrol, Gujarat: A Comprehensive Study
Vasimkhan U. Khilchi , Jatin V. Raval
Zoology Lab, Department of Life Sciences, Bhakta Kavi Narsinh Mehta University, Junagadh, Gujarat, India
Corresponding Author Email: drjatinraval@bknmu.edu.in
DOI : https://doi.org/10.51470/JOD.2025.4.2.76
Abstract
The coastline of Gujarat is 2340.62 km long and possesses rich marine biodiversity. During the present study, a total of 113 fish species belonging to 60 families and 25 orders were identified from the different fish landing sites of Mangrol fish landing centre Gujarat, India. From September 2022 to March 2023, data were gathered from a variety of places in various regions with the assistance of local, knowledgeable fish growers and fishermen. Fish identification was conducted on the basis of freshly collected specimens to ensure accuracy. Typical taxonomic keys were used to identify them. The fish that were gathered underwent species-level identification. The checklist contains 3 species Critically endangered; 7 species were Near Threatened, 10 species were Data deficient, 6 species were endangered, 66 species were Least concern, 7 species were Vulnerable, and 10 species were Not evaluated. Additional studies are required to enhance the understanding and conservation of these species.
Keywords
Introduction:
Marine environments are characterized by a variety of genetics, taxonomy, and ecology. More than 99% of the surface of the Earth is covered by oceans and large seas, with a coastline of about 1.6 million km. This provides ample room for life in the ecosystem [7]. Coastal and marine environments can be found in 123 different countries [30]. Pisces are a vital component in Asian diets and one of the most significant food and nutrition sources [18]. Ichthyofaunal diversity comprises approximately half of all vertebrate species worldwide, with 35,797 confirmed fish species [10]. The distribution of fish species is not uniform across the world, with some regions being more diverse than others. tropical areas of the globe, particularly those in the Indo-Pacific, are known to be the most diverse for fish species [3]. In contrast, the Polar Regions and deep-sea habitats few fish species due to the harsh environmental conditions.
The Indian Ocean occupies over 29% of the total oceanic area, making it the third largest ocean in the world [32]. The Arabian Sea is an important region for marine fish diversity, as it is home to a wide range of fish species adapted to its warm, saline waters. The Arabian Sea is part of the larger Indian Ocean is bounded by several countries, including India, Pakistan, Oman, Yemen, and Somalia. The fishes of the Arabian Sea are characterized by a mix of tropical and subtropical species, with some species extending into the temperate waters of the northern Arabian Sea. Some of the most commercially Significant fish species found in the Arabian Sea include tuna, mackerel, barracuda, and sardines [9]. The Arabian Sea is also home to a number of endemic fish species, which are found nowhere else in the world. For example, the Arabian scad [Trachurus indicus] is a small pelagic fish that is found only in the Arabian Sea and adjacent waters [23].
India ranks as one of the world’s 12 mega biodiversity countries, accounting for 7.8% of all documented species despite having only 2.5% of the land area [33;22]. India has 2456 species of fish, 930 of which are found in freshwater environments and 1526 of which are found in marine environments [15]. India is a mega-diversity rich country noted for its species richness [12]. India’s coastal geography spans approximately 8,118 kilometres, with Gujarat state alone accounting for approximately 1600 kilometers of coastline [1]. The Indian mainland coastline is divided into two parts – Eastern and Western coastline. Gujarat state has the longest coastline of about 1,650 km, which accounts for 21% of the total coastline and 32% of the total continental shelf of India. It has diverse coastal habitats located on the western part of India [16]. Gujarat has experienced remarkable development in the marine capture fisheries sector [11]. Gujarat has a wealth of marine fisheries resources by nature, with 306 species of marine and coastal fishes, including significant supplies of osteichthyes and elasmobranchs [21;29;16;27;28;06]. Gujarat’s coastline stands out from other coastal regions in India due to its unique characteristics. It features a shallow coastal zone, an expansive continental shelf, and extensive saline and tidal mudflats. Along the Saurashtra coast, the continental shelf extends gradually, reaching a depth of 60 meters over a span of approximately 350 kilometers [26]. The coastline of Gujarat can be arbitrarily divided into four coastal stretches, namely the Gulf of Kachchh, Saurashtra Coast, Gulf of Khambhat, and South Gujarat Coast [16]. The Gulf of Cambay, Gulf of Kachchh, and Saurashtra peninsula have several major and minor fish landing centers.The Saurashtra coast is distinguished by its rocky, sandy, and muddy introduction zones, which support a broad range of plants and Animals [25]. The Saurashtra-peninsular region of Gujarat covers the largest part of the total coastline, around 750 km, and has around 7 major and several minor fish landing centers [4]. Gujarat is home to a variety of marine habitats, including coral reefs, mangroves, and estuaries. Gujarat state ranks top in Fisheries since it is located on the west coast of India includes an exclusive economic zone and one-fifth of the nation’s coastline [8]. It accounts for around 20% of overall marine production. Gujarat comes third in fish production, after Andhra Pradesh [29.47%] and West Bengal [12.58%], with a total production of 8.59 lakh tonnes, accounting for 6.06% of India’s total fish production in 2019-20 [13]. In the nearby study area, several notable studies have been conducted, including research on crabs by [24], An examination of the community structure of marine macrofauna along the Diu coast by [5], and an evaluation of the variety of intertidal micro benthic plants and animals in the coastal region of South Saurashtra.
Mangrol is a town by the sea in the Junagadh district of Gujarat, and it is one of the major harbours in the state. It is situated on the southern shore of the Saurashtra peninsula and is known for its fishing industry [2]. The harbour is an important hub for the fishing boats that operate along the coast of Gujarat. Mangrol is the fourth highest contributor to the total fish catch in Gujarat. This means that it plays a crucial role in the fishing industry of the state. The fishermen of Mangrol use traditional fishing techniques such as trawling and gill netting to catch a variety of marine species. In terms of boat arrivals, Mangrol is the second highest contributor after Veraval. The arrival of fishing boats at the harbour is an important indicator of the level of fishing activity in the region. The fact that Mangrol has a high number of boat arrivals highlights its significance in the fishing industry of Gujarat [19]. Mangrol, along with Veraval and Porbandar, accounts for nearly half of the total fish catch in Gujarat [19]. This highlights the importance of Mangrol in the fishing industry of the state. The harbour provides a livelihood for thousands of fishermen and is a significant source of seafood for the people of Gujarat.
Materials and Methods
Study area
The current research was carried out along the coastal waters of Mangrol.[21° 06′ 45.92″ N 70° 05′ 34.18″ E], Which is located in western coast of Gujarat, India .
Data collection
Data for ichthyofaunal diversity were collected from landing sites of Mangrol [Figure 1]. Data were obtained with the assistance of local fisherman landings and by visiting Mangrol new and old jetty, Mangrol bandar, new and old fish markets, which is situated in Mangrol taluka of the Junagadh district in the state of Gujarat, India.
Sampling was carried out every two weeks interval at the beginning of study from September 2022 to March 2023. .A variety of facing gears, including gil nets, hook and line, trawl nets, and purse seines with varying mesh sizes, were used to gather samples. Extensive photography is been used for the data collection.
Identification of fishes
The collected specimen had been cleaned properly. Informative photographic documentation had been done before preservation. Identification of the species was carried out using morphological features and morphometry. Morphological identification was done to discover the recognizable characters of individual species as each fish species has a couple of specific characters which separate it from others.
Identification of fish was done with the help of various standard taxonomic keys viz., Talwar and Jhingran [1991] [31], Handbook for field identification of Fish species occurring in the Indian seas [FSI 2009], Training manual of species Identification [ICAR-CMFRI 2017], Field Guide for the identification of major demersal fishes of India by Wilson and his colleagues [34], Identification of Groupers and Snappers Available in Indian Water by Nair Rekha J. [2022] [20].
The authentication of the identified fish specimens was done with the help of available keys like www.fishbase.org, a verified and certified website of the Food and Agricultural Organization, talk about Fishes a Malaysian fish database, Fish Base of India and Eschmeyer’s Catalog of Fishes https://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp. The ICUN red list [14] was employed to ascertain the studied species’ conservation status. The categories are as follows: NE, not evaluated; DD, data deficient; LC, least concern; NT, near threatened, VU, vulnerable; EN, endangered; CR, critically endangered. Table 1 displays the species checklist and common names for the species under study.
Results and Discussion
A total of 113 finfish species, representing 60 families in 25 orders from the coast of Mangrol were identified. [Table 1]
With 16 species, the order Carangiformes is the most prevalent, followed by Scombriformes [13], Perciformes [12], Eupercaria [11], Myliobatiformes [7], Carcharhiniformes [7], Pleuronectiformes [6], Acanthuriformes [6], Tetraodontiformes [5], Rhinopristiformes [3] Anguilliformes [3], Tetradontiformes [3], Beloniformes [3], Siluriformes [3], Carangaria [3], Holocentriformes [2], Clupeiformes [2], Torpediniformes [1], Centrarchiformes [1], Syngnathiformes [1], Mulliformes [1], Ophidiiformes [1], Scorpaenoidei [1], Carcharhiniformes [1], Scorpaeniformes [1]. [Figure 5] According to a price analysis of the Mangrol fish market, the cost of the fish ranges from 10 to 15 000/kg. Fish such as Jew fish [ghol], silver pomfret, tunas, sharks, ribbon fish, Herrings, dara, and others were the most expensive in the market.
Figure 3: Graphical representation of Family wise species composition of Fish.
There was total 60 families of finfish species were reported in this research. Among the Carangidae is the family that contributes the most finfish species [12 spp.]., followed by Scombridae [9 spp.], Serranidae [5 spp.], Carcharhinidae [4 spp.], Dasyatidae, Balistidae, Tetraodontidae, and Ariidae [3 spp.], Rhinidae, Aetobatidae, Polynemidae, Epinephlidae, Muranenesocidae, Paralichthyidae, Cynoglossidae, Soleidae, Holocentridae, Trichiuridae, Stromateidae, Belonidae, Dorosomatidae and sphyraenidae [2 spp.] Each of the remaining 37 families reported one species of fish diversity [Figure 3].
As per IUCN red list status 2021, 3 species were Critically endangered, 7 species as Near threaten, 10 species as Data deficient, 6 species as endangered, 66 species as Least concern, 7 species as Vulnerable, and 10 species as Not evaluated. [Figure 4]
During the study, only a few individuals of Critically Endangered species were observed. For instance, only 2 individuals of Rhina ancylostomus, 4 individuals of Aetobatus narinari, and 2 individuals of Mobula mobula were observed, all of which are classified as Endangered. Similarly, only 2 individuals of Leopard whip ray and 5-6 individuals of Ocean sunfish, both classified as Vulnerable, were observed. This suggests that either these species were captured in very small numbers or they are rare in the field.
In a study on economically important marine fin fish and shellfish near the Okha [Dwarka district] fish landing centre in Gujarat, Solanki and colleagues [2020] [29] identified 86 fin fish species from 74 genera. The most abundant species included flounders, sharks, lizard fishes, croakers, seer fishes, pomfrets, rays, ribbon fish, thread fins, mackerels, skates, eels, grunters and sweet lips, reef cods, catfishes, barracuda, sole fishes, flying fishes, full beak, and other fishes.
Joshi and colleagues [2018] [15] conducted a study at the Kharakuva Fish market in Veraval Taluka of Gir-Somnath district and identified 94 finfish and 26 shellfish species belonging to 62 families and 18 orders. The study found that Carangidae had the highest number of species [9 spp.], followed by Scombridae [7 spp.], Sciaenidae [6 spp.], Synodontidae [5 spp.], Clupeidae [4 spp.], and various other families. The most abundant order of finfish was Perciformes with 54.26%, followed by Clupeiformes [8.51%], Carcharhiniformes [5.32%], and other orders with lower percentages. The study also provided market prices for various fish, ranging from 20 to 1500 rupees. High-priced fish included Jew fish [Ghol], Silver pomfret, Chinese pomfret, Indian scad, Chinese herring, silver conger eel, Sharks, and Ribbon fishes. These fish were primarily consumed fresh, while the remaining catch was processed and exported to other countries after value addition and freezing.
In 2017, Katira and Kardani [17] conducted an investigation on the diversity of ichthyofauna present along the Sikka coast. According to their research, there were 112 fish species spread throughout 12 orders, 50 families, and 84 genera. Perciformes possessed the greatest number of families, totaling 29, followed by Clupeiformes with five families and Pleuronectiformes with three families. The remaining orders, including Elopiformes, Siluriformes, Tetraodontiformes, and Beloniformes, contained two families each, while Carcharhiniformes, Myliobatiformes, Anguilliformes, Gonorhynchiformes, and Scopaeniformes had only one family each. Family Carangidae contributed the highest percentage, with 11.6% and 13 species, followed by Serranidae and Clupeidae with a 6.25% contribution each, containing seven species each. Haemulidae, Mugilidae, Sparidae, and Tetraodontidae each contributed 4% to 5%, while Dasyatidae, Garreidae, Leiognathidae, Sciaenidae, and Ariidae contributed 3% each. Other families contributed 2% and 1%. Family Carangidae had the most fish species, with 13, followed by Serranidae and Clupeidae with seven species each, Haemulidae with six species, Sparidae and Mugilidae with five species each, and Tetraodontidae with four species. Ariidae, Sciaenidae, Dasyatidae, Garreidae, and Leiognathidae all had three species each, while other families had one to two species. Overall, the Sikka coast had 112 recorded fish species distributed across 50 distinct families.\
Conclusion
The study conducted on the coast of Mangrol identified a total of 113 finfish species belonging to 60 families in 25 orders. The orders that are most prevalent in terms of species were Carangiformes, Scombriformes, and Perciformes. The market price study indicated that the price of fish varied between 10-1500/- with Jewfish, Silver pomfret, Tunas, Sharks, Ribbon fish, Herrings, and Dara fetching the highest prices. Among the families, Carangidae contributed the most significant number of finfish species. A few critically endangered species were observed during the study, including Rhina ancylostomus, Aetobatus narinari, and Mobula mobula. However, the low number of individuals observed for these species suggests that they are either rare or captured in very small numbers, the study offers important details about the variety and state of conservation of finfish species along the Mangrol coast.
Acknowledgement
We are very grateful to the Department of Life Sciences, Bhakta Kavi Narsinh Mehta University, Junagadh. We are also thankful to local fishermen and fish traders for their support during the field work.
References
- Abraham, M.; Mahendra, R.S.; Mandla, V.R.; Merugu, C.S. & Peddinti, V.S. [2020]. Geospatial-based Coastal risk assessment of Gujarat coastline. In: Saride, S.; Umashankar, B. & Avirneni. D. Lecture notes in Civil Engineering in Advances in Geotechnical and Transportation Engineering, Vol. 71. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd., Singapore. Pp. 50-66.
- Agravat Pooja, Ajay Baldaniya, Biplab Banerjee, Agradeep Mohanta, Jatin V. Raval and Pradeep Mankodi [2025]. Molluscan Marvels of Gujarat: exploring species distribution and conservation strategies using a special approach. Environmental science and pollution research.
- Allen, G. R., & Adrim, M. [2003]. Coral reef fishes of Indonesia. Zoological Studies, 42[1], 1-72.
- Baldaniya, B., Dave, K., Haldhar, S., and Jadav, R. [2022]. Growth performance and yield of captive-bred silver pompano Trachinotus blochii [Lacépède, 1801] under different feeding regimes. Journal of Aquaculture Research and Development, 13[1], 1-9.
- Bambhaniya Gautam B. and Jatin V. Raval [2023]. Community structure of Marine Macrofauna at Diu coast, Gujarat, India. Environment and Ecology, 41 [4A], 2474-2484.
- Bhatt, D., Singh, S. K., and Mankodi, P. C. [2022]. New record of spot-tail sleeper ray Narke dipterygia [Bloch and Schneider, 1801] [Elasmobranchii, Torpediniformes, Narkidae] from the coast of Gujarat, India. Journal of Fisheries, 10[1], 101401.
- Brahmane, V. T., Temkar, G. S., Meta r, S. Y., Sikotaria, K. M., and Desai, A. Y. [2014]. Ichthyofounal diversity in the vicinity of marine protected areas, Jamnagar, Gulf of Kachchh, India. Asian Journal of Advanced Basic Science, 3, 78-88.
- Department of Fisheries, India. [2025]. Marine Fisheries. Dof.gov.in. https://dof.gov.in/marine-fisheries
- FAO [2018]. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2018 – Meeting the sustainable development goals. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
- Fricke, R., Eschmeyer, W. N., and Van der Laan, R. [Eds.]. [2021]. Eschmeyer’s catalog of fishes: Genera, species, references. California Academy of Sciences.
- Gopalkrishnan S. [2018]. Indian marine fisheries-a review. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies, 6[2], 23-27.
- Gopi, K.C. & Mishra, S.S. [2015]. Diversity of Marine Fish of India. In: Venkataraman, K. & Sivaperuman, C. Marine Faunal Diversity in India: Taxonomy Ecology and Conservation. Chapter 12. Academic press, USA. Pp. 171-193.
- Government of India, 2020. Commissioner of Fisheries, Agriculture, Farmers Welfare and Co-operation Department, Government of Gujarat. Retrieved from Commissioner of Fisheries [gujarat.gov.in] https://fsi.gov.in/LATEST-WB-SITE/fsi-db-frm.htm
https://www.fishbase.se https://www.talkaboutfish.com
- IUCN [International Union for Conservation of Nature], [2021]. Status of the World’s Marine Species.The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, Species Survival Commission, 1-2.
- Joshi, A.; Parmar, E.A.R.; Temkar, G.S.; Desai, A.Y. & Bhatt, A.J. [2018]. Ichthyofaunal biodiversity of Kharakuva Fish Market, Veraval, Gujarat, India. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management 9: 596-605.
- Joshi, K.K., Thobias, P.A., Varsha, M.S., [2017]. Present status of ichthyofaunal diversity of Indian seas. In: Course Manual Summer School on Advanced Methods of Fish Stock Assessment and Fisheries Management. Lecture Note Series No. 2/2017. Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute [CMFRI], Kochi, Kerala, 1–22.
- Katira, J. and Kardani, D., [2017]. Ichthyofaunal diversity of Sikka coast, Gujarat, India. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India, 59[1], pp.34-41.
- Maher Neel P., Jatin V. Raval and Nilesh H. Joshi [2025]. Partial replacement of fish feed with seaweed Ulva and it’s effect on growth and survival of Catla catla fingerlings. Journal of diversity studies [46-51].
- MPEDA newsletter report April 2021 Thomsan and Afsal [April 2021]. India’s marine fish landings increase in March. MPEDA newsletter, 17-23
- Nair, R. J., Vishnupriya, K. M., Sangeetha, A. T., & Mahesh, V. [2022]. Identification of Groupers and Snappers available in Indian Waters.ICAR- Central marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi, Kerala 220-246
- Parmar, H., Barad, D., & Parasharya, D. [2015]. Reef dependent ichthyofauna of the Gulf of Kachchh, Gujarat, Western India. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies, 2[6], 33-37.
- Paunikar, S., & Das, M. K [2024]. Study on Marine Water Food Fish Biodiversity Across the Fish Market in Jabalpur City, Madhya Pradesh, Central India. Biological Forum – An International Journal 2249-3239
- Peter, K. L. [2000]. The state of marine biodiversity in the South China Sea. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, [8], 3-7.
- Raval Jatin V., Sonali K. Chauhan, Hitesh K. Kardani and Piyush J. Vadher [2020]. Diversity Of Marine Brachyuran Crabs from The Sikka coast, Gujarat, India. J. Exp. Zool.India, 23[2], 1463-147.
- Ravaliya Rachna N. and Jatin V. Raval [2020]. Diversity and Distribution Of Molluscan at Veraval Coastal Area, Gujarat, India. The Bioscan – An International Quarterly Journal Of Life Sciences, 15[4], 467-473.
- Sanjeevi, P., Pande, A., & Kuppusamy, S. [2014]. Status of coastal and marine protected areas in Gujarat. ENVIS Bulletin on Coastal and Marine Protected Areas in India: Challenges and Way Forward, 50-63.
- Sidat, A. A., Mukherji, P., Trivedi, T., and Mankodi, P. C. [2021]. Ichthyofauna species diversity of Gulf of Kachchh, Gujarat, India Case study: Jakhau and Mandvi coast. Iranian Journal of Ichthyology, 8[2], 134-149.
- Singh, S. K., Sarma, K. J., Bhatt, D. M., and Mankodi, P. C. [2021]. Ichthyofaunal diversity and fishery status of Sutrapada Coast, Gujarat, India. Journal of Fisheries, 9[2], 92204.
- Solanki, J. B., Bajaniya, V. C., Parmar, H. V., Tank, K. V., & Parmar, H. L. [2020]. Availability of commercially important of marine fin fish and shell fish along Okha fish landing centre, Gujarat. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 8[1], 637-640.
- Spalding, M. D., Fox, H. E., Allen, G. R., Davidson, N., Ferdaña, Z. A., Finlayson, M. A. X., … & Robertson, J. [2007]. Marine ecoregions of the world: a bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas. BioScience, 57[7], 573-583.
- Talwar, P.K., Jhingran, A.G., [1991]. Inland Fishes of India and adjacent countries. Oxford & IBH Co. Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi.
- Venkataraman, K., & Raghunathan, C. [2015]. Coastal and marine biodiversity of India. In Marine Faunal Diversity in India [pp. 303-348]. Academic Press.
- Venkataraman, K., [2006]. Biodiversity Legislations in Like Minded Megadiverse Countries. In: Verma, D.D., Arora, S., Rai, R.K. [Eds.], Prospective on Biodiversity: A vision for Megadiverse Countries. Ministry of Environment and Science, Center for Environment Education, Ahmedabad, 79–92.
- Wilson, Livi, Najmudeen, T. M., & Zacharia, P. U. [2019]. Field Identification of Major Demersal Teleost Fish Species along the Indian Coast. In: Advances in Marine Fisheries in India, 18-23 February 2019, Kochi.