Seasonality of Leaf Fall and Litter Production in Sal (Shorea Robusta Gaertn.F.) ANR Forest in Tarai East Forest Division, Haldwani
Bhaskar Ch. Joshi , Himanshu Bagri
Tarai East Forest Division, Haldwani, Uttarakhand, India
Corresponding Author Email: Bhaskar20.alm@gmail.com
DOI : https://doi.org/10.51470/JOD.2025.4.2.01
Abstract
Sal (Shorea robusta), which is widely spread in both moist and dry forests in across the tropics, has been inconsistently described as either deciduous, semi-deciduous or evergreen species. To assess this contradiction, a quantitative record of the sal leaf dynamics (via monthly counts on tagged leaf falls and twigs) was made in different ANR sites of the Tarai East Forest Division, Haldwani. By using sample plots, the annual leaf fall data was collected and analyzed. The annual litter production (leaf fall & twigs) was maximum (8003.38 kg ha–1 yr –1) recorded in Surai (Jhankiya) followed by Kishanpur (Horai) 5434.52 kg ha–1 yr –1; Jaulasal (Bera) 5291.03 kg ha–1 yr –1 and its seasonality (month of leaf-fall) was 12-16% in ( Ist February – 1stMarch), 22.0-30.0% in (Ist March – Ist April) and 40.0-43.0% in (Ist April to Ist May) in Summer. In the species level the Shorea robusta (86-90%) has maximum leaf fall coverage in ground, followed by Largestoennia sp. (6.0-10.0%), Terminalia sp. (2.0-6.0%), Schleichera oleides (0-2.0%) and Bauhinia sp. (0-2.0%) was observed. Throughout in March – April ( the transitio-nal month for the leafing pheno-phase); the two phenological variation were observed and reflecting significant functional diversity in sal trees. These variation were as follows; variation (a). Leaf fall completed and new leaf flushing begins; variation (b). Leaf fall and new leaf flush overlapping together. The presence of these variants are indicating that the most of individual of sal trees have semi-deciduous or evergreen characters in the division.
Keywords
Introduction
The seasonal patterns of tropical trees phenology are typically influenced by the duration and intensity of seasonal drought [1] and even trees of the of the same species can undergo varying level of drough stress [2]. In tropical trees, the seasonal period of leafing, flowering and fruiting espesically decided through phenological behavior or events. These phenological events are not entirely independent among woody species , as flowering may be partially or entirely dependent on leafing activity [3], [4].The classification of sal (Shorea robusta) regarding leaf phenology has always been ambiguous due to the evergreen versus deciduous dilemma. Some researchers have classified sal (S.robusta) as a deciduous species [5], while others have categorized it as semi-deciduous [6]; Additionally,some have identified it as an evergreen species [7], [8], leading to various interpretations of S. robusta as either deciduous or as exiting on the borderline between evergreen and deciduous.
In numerous evergreen species and various deciduous types, (leaf flushing and flowering) often take place simultaneously on the same new shoot. The intense drought faced by different tree species can reliably be signified by the period of leaflessness (deciduousness), which represents a cumulative effect of seasonal drought, tree traits, and soil moisture levels[2]. During the period of seasonal drought, the leafless state in trees aids in the rehydration of the stem or twig, which is a precondition for the following flowering or leaf flushing [9], [10].
The production of litter is plays a very important role in the dynamics of terrestrial ecosystem, particularly through nutrient circulation between plant and soil as well as moisture retention [11],[12]. The litter fall is key input of organic matter and nutrients in the soil being proportional to primary productivity in the natural sal forest, the amount of the litter fall is one of the major processes of the ecosystem and determine the type of cycling of nutrients in forest ecosystems [13].
Therefore, the litter fall may be considered as one of the most valuable decisive factor for the assessment of the changes undergone by the disturbed ecosystems. The ecology related to litter and forest floor in forest ecosystems emphasizes their role in carbon balance, nutrient cycling and soil health. It is thus essential to measure the amount of forest floor and litter fall [14], [15]. Despite extensive litter studies in tropical forest ecosystems [2], [16], [17], [18],[19], [20], [21] The Studies on litter dynamics in disturbed forests especially in reference to tree leaf falls and impact of seasonality is very limited.
The present aim of research article is to assess the impact of seasonality of leaf fall pattern and analysis total annual Sal litter production (leafs & twigs) of Sal ANR in Tarai East Forest Division Haldwani, and tried to highlight the phenological variant, reflecting, and considerable functional diversity in sal trees in the division.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study area
Tarai East Forest Division (TEFD) is a part of the vast Tarai Arc Landscape (TAL) of Uttarakhand, India and comprises an area of 82,429.0 ha of Tarai and Bhabar tracts and lies between N28°.43′ to N29°.10′ Latitude and E N79°30′ to N80°.10′ Longitude. It has also connected with the Nandhaur Wildlife Sanctuary (NWS) and the Pilibhit Tiger Reserve (PTR) through Kilpura-Khatima-Surai corridor of tropical dry deciduous of central India. The area is home to very important wildlife species like elephants, tigers, crocodiles etc. Increasing population and dependency on forests, encroachment, overgrazing, poaching etc. are some of the challenges that threaten wildlife and its habitat. The division has covered a total of 9 ranges namely Kilpura, Khatima, Surai, Gaula, Ransali, Dauli, Barakoli, Kishanpur and Jaulasal. these ranges are highly covered with Sal Forests. This forest division is characterized by Moist Tarai and Bhabar Sal forest (3C/C2c & 3C/C2b) [22] and coving a total of 28% area of the Sal Forest of Division. In the division, the soil condition is predominantly characterized by a brown color, exhibiting an acidic to neutral reaction, and has a texture ranging from sandy loam to fine loamy.
The total annual rainfall was maximum average 1738.5 mm recorded (during the monsoon season from mid-June to September). The maximum average temperature of recorded in May – June (37.8 -39.1°C) and minimum (6.6-9.1°C) in January- February months of the division.
Selection of Study Sites
For the study, the three ANR sites, namely Kishanpur Range (Horai), Jaulasal Range (Bera) & Surai range (Jhankiya) were selected and covered Western to Eastern part of the division (Fig.1).
Fig.1. Location Map of Selected Site of Tarai East Forest Division, Haldwani
Methodology
Litter Collection and measurement of litter sample
The study on litter fall was conducted across various Sal-ANR locations by establishing litter plots with dimensions of 5m x 5m through ground random sampling techniques. A total of 5 (5m x 5 m) plots were laid in one hectare in each site. All plant matter and dead organic debris were thoroughly cleaned, weighed (with litter fractions recorded individually) and taken away. Litter that accumulated on the plots was gathered weekly basis on a predetermined date (January to December) over the entire year. The litter was sorted into distinct components (leaves, twigs) and weighed for each sample plot (Photo1.). In the study area, the climate is characterized by four distinct seasons viz., monsoon ( June to September), winter (December to January) and summer ( April to June) and spring (February to March), respectively. (Photo.1,2,3).
Photo.2. Collection leaf litter from Sample plots
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The Phenology of Shorea robusta (Sal)
During survey, the phenology of Sal ( Shorea robusta) was observed as follow; the leaf fall was started from the month of January to end of April and new leaves sprout started from March to April month. The flowering take place from the month of (March to IIst May) and fruiting began in the last week of May or Ist week of June in TEFD division (Fig.2).
Total Annual Litter fall of Sal
Leaf fall of Sal and its seasonality
Leaf fall of coverage of Sal Associate species:
In species level the Shorea robusta (86-90%) was maximum leaf fall coverage in ground followed by Largestoennia sp. (6.0-10.0%), Terminalia Sp. (2.0-6.0%); Schleichera oleides (0-2.0%) and Bauhinia sp (0-2.0%) was observed respectively.(Fig.5).
Temprature and Humidity trends during the climax period of leaf fall
During the climax period of the leaf fall was considerably from March to April Month. For analyzing variation of the temprature & humidity in differents site, the weekly temprature was collected and analyzed of these peak period. Based on the colleted data the maximum temprature was recored 37.1°C in March-April in Surai (Jhankiya) range followed by Kishanpur (Horai) range 33.43° C, 32.26° C in Jaulasal (Bera) and mimimum in respectivly(Fig.7, Fig.8). Similaly in humidity was maximum recorded (63.8%) in Jaulasal (Bera) followed by (42.6%) Kishanpur, (Horai) and (37.1%) in Surai (Jhankiya). (Fig.9, Fig.10). A positive trend was showing in between the temprature and leaf fall and negative trande was obsereved with humidity and leaf in the ANR sites. (Fig.6).
Phenological variants of Shorea robusta (Sal)
In contrast to the deciduous tree species that typically exhibit summer-flushing (with vegetative bud breaks occurring during the hot-dry summer months of May–June); the Sal (Shorea robusta) is classified as a spring-flushing species, with vegetative bud breaks occurring around the time of spring equinox, specifically in March and April, within Indian dry tropical forests[2]. The period surrounding the spring equinox is important because of the overlap of leaf fall, leaf flushing, and flowering/fruiting in sal (S. robusta) [2]. The phenomenon of annual leaf exchange (ALE) in Sal (Shorea robusta) within tropical dry deciduous forests prompts several inquiries [2]. (i). Is this species evergreen or deciduous? (ii) Do the trees exhibit a uniform phenological response? [2]. To address these inquiries, phenological data was gathered during the periods of leaf fall and leaf flush at selected sites within the division.
In the current study, the two phenological variants of Sal (Shorea robusta) were notable based on their contrasting leaf phenological events observed during March and April (Photo.5. & Photo 6.). These variants were: (i). (variants a) – leaf fall completed and leaf flush begins; (ii). (variant b)- leaf fall and leaf flush overlapping. In months (March –April) in each of ANR sites has : (i) 60 % individuals of sal tree showed completion of leaf fall and beginning of leaf flush and 40% individuals showed overlapping in leaf fall and leaf flushing.
Conclusion
The Annual leaf exchange time (leaf fall & leaf flushing) depends on the micro-climatic conditions and the accessibility of sub-soil water reserves in drought season in sal forests. The litter fall was highest (81-84%) in summer season (February- May) in the sal forest. In present study, the Shorea robusta shows an opportunistic leaf phenological nature, most of the individuals being able to tolerate deciduous, semi-deciduous or evergreen species. Based on the finding on phenology, it may be predicted that, the enough moisture content and temperature during the favorable growth season of S. robusta, M. philippinensis, Largestoennia sp., Terminalia Sp. The data of litter fall in different ANR site can help to assess the carbon stock of the sal forest ecosystem of the division. The data set is also suggest that few implications e.g. waterholes that needs for increasing the soil moisture and humidity particularly in dry area in Surai & Kishanpur range in nearby Sal ANR sites; few of amount of the ground litter (leaf fall) of Shorea robusta can be utilized for organic leaf manure and support to reduce the forest fire. The present data set will also support on developing plans related to impact of climate change in Sal forest, mitigation of forest fire, soil nutrients and micro- organisms studies in division.
REFERENCES
- MOONEY, H. A. (1995). N. MICHELE HOLBROOK, JULIE L. WHITBECK &. Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests, 243.
- Singh, K. P., & Kushwaha, C. P. (2006). Diversity of flowering and fruiting phenology of trees in a tropical deciduous forest in India. Annals of botany, 97(2), 265-276.
- Singh, J. S., & Singh, V. K. (1992). Phenology of seasonally dry tropical forest. Current science, 684-689.
- Van Schaik, C. P., Terborgh, J. W., & Wright, S. J. (1993). The phenology of tropical forests: adaptive significance and consequences for primary consumers. Annual Review of ecology and Systematics, 353-377.
- Tiwari, D. N. (1995). A monograph on sal (Shorea robusta). International Book Distributors, Dehra Dun.
- Bor, N. L. (1953). Manual of Indian forest botany. Oxford University Press, Bombay, 1953, p. 441.
- Singh, J. S., & Singh, S. P. (1992). Forests of Himalaya Gyanodaya Prakashan. Nainital, India.
- Joshi, H. B. (Ed.). (1980). Troup’s The silviculture of Indian trees. Volume II. Dipterocarpaceae.
- Kushwaha, C. P., & Singh, K. P. (2005). Diversity of leaf phenology in a tropical deciduous forest in India. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 21(1), 47-56.
- Pooja Kukreti, P. K., & Negi, J. D. S. (2004). Tree mortality and vegetational changes in a natural Sal forest of Barkot Range, Dehra Dun Forest Division.
- Giweta, M. (2020). Role of litter production and its decomposition, and factors affecting the processes in a tropical forest ecosystem: a review. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 44(1), 11.
- Cuevas E, Lugo AE. Dynamics of organic matter and nutrient return from litterfall in stands of ten tropical tree plantation species. For Ecol Manage. 1998;112: 263–79
- Berg, B. (2000). Litter decomposition and organic matter turnover in northern forest soils. Forest ecology and Management, 133(1-2), 13-22.
- Wang, Q., Wang, S., & Huang, Y. (2008). Comparisons of litterfall, litter decomposition and nutrient return in a monoculture Cunninghamia lanceolata and a mixed stand in southern China. Forest Ecology and Management, 255(3-4), 1210-1218.
- Pandey, R. R., Sharma, G., Tripathi, S. K., & Singh, A. K. (2007). Litterfall, litter decomposition and nutrient dynamics in a subtropical natural oak forest and managed plantation in northeastern India. Forest Ecology and Management, 240(1-3), 96-104.
- Borchert, R. (1998). Responses of tropical trees to rainfall seasonality and its long-term changes. Climatic change, 39(2), 381-393.
- Kushwaha, C. P., & Singh, K. P. (2005). Diversity of leaf phenology in a tropical deciduous forest in India. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 21(1), 47-56.
- Visalakshi, N. (1993). Litterfall, standing crop of litter and their nutrients in two tropical dry evergreen forests in India. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 19(3), 163-180.
- Bullock, S. H., Mooney, H. A., & Medina, E. (Eds.). (1995). Seasonally dry tropical forests. Cambridge University Press.
- Wang, Q., Wang, S., & Huang, Y. (2008). Comparisons of litterfall, litter decomposition and nutrient return in a monoculture Cunninghamia lanceolata and a mixed stand in southern China. Forest Ecology and Management, 255(3-4), 1210-1218.
- Waring, B. G. (2012). A meta-analysis of climatic and chemical controls on leaf litter decay rates in tropical forests. Ecosystems, 15, 999-1009.
22. Champion, H. G., & Seth, S. K. (1968). A revised survey of the forest types of India. Manager of publications.